By: Luka Dickson

Construction projects, whether large or small, are complex endeavours that involve numerous stakeholders, intricate plans, and substantial investments. Unfortunately, even with meticulous planning, disputes can arise during construction, leading to claims and conflicts that require resolution. This is where the Civil Administrative Tribunal (CAT) comes into play, offering an efficient and cost-effective alternative to traditional litigation for settling construction claim disputes. The civil administrative tribunal is state-specific, so in Victoria, the institution will be VCAT, Queensland NCAT and New South Wales, NCAT.

What is the role of a Civil Administrative Tribunal?

In Australian states, Civil and Administrative Tribunals (CATs) play a crucial role in the justice system by providing accessible and efficient avenues for resolving various types of disputes and administrative matters. The tribunal sits ‘below’ a magistrate’s court within a court hierarchy and will have different levels of power depending on the specific state.

For example, in Victoria, the VCAT is a regulatory institution and only has the power and jurisdiction provided by the state parliament. However, its orders are enforceable by law after registration with the magistrate’s court.

What are the benefits of using a CAT to resolve construction claim disputes?

Civil and Administrative Tribunals (CATs) offer numerous advantages for resolving disputes, particularly in cases like construction claims, where a less formal and adversarial approach is often preferred. These benefits include accessibility, speed, cost-effectiveness, and binding decisions. CATs prioritise accessibility, aiming to create a user-friendly environment for individuals, small businesses, and community organisations. Parties can choose to seek legal assistance as needed; however, the tribunal encourages self-representation, making the process more affordable and approachable. The streamlined processes allow for quicker dispute resolution compared to traditional court proceedings.

Furthermore, CATs offer cost-effectiveness. Traditional court litigation can incur substantial expenses, including legal fees and court-related costs due to the requirement for representation. CATs provide a cost-effective alternative, reducing the financial burden on dispute-involved parties. Parties must comply with the tribunal’s rulings, ensuring that resolutions reached through the CAT process are upheld and enforced.

In construction claims, where expert witnesses and mediation are often part of the process, CATs provide a well-suited platform for resolving disputes efficiently and effectively. These tribunals prioritise accessibility and fairness while maintaining the legally binding nature of their decisions, making them a valuable resource for dispute resolution.

Dispute Resolution:

CATs handle a wide range of disputes, including administrative, civil, residential tenancies and human rights. They offer a less formal and more accessible alternative to traditional court proceedings. This includes disputes related to tenancy, consumer complaints, building and construction, discrimination, guardianship, and many more.

Construction claim disputes:

Construction claim disputes often revolve around financial matters, such as incomplete or substandard work resulting in defects or faults. One party believes, they are entitled to some form of compensation, refund or recompletion of work – and the other party disagrees with that conclusion.

To effectively resolve such disputes, an expert witness can be hired by one of the involved parties. The expert witness must have expertise in the field, so for construction claim disputes – this role is designated to a quantity surveyor as they specialise in cost estimation services related to construction processes. Their role is crucial in providing precise cost information to address and rectify the dispute. The witness is required to undertake a thorough examination of the case and subsequently prepare a comprehensive report. This report is presented to the parties and tribunal, it contains an overview of the issues at hand, presents the factual evidence, and outlines the calculations employed by the expert witness to formulate their expert opinion on the dispute’s outcome.

Additionally, these reports extend beyond the examination of facts and opinions. They also provide detailed cost assessments and recommendations. The documentation ensures that the tribunal has a clear and accurate representation of the expert witness’s findings and the rationale behind their conclusion.

What can’t a civil administration tribunal do?

Given Civil Administration Tribunals are state-based, they cannot hear cases involving federal jurisdiction. This applies when the parties involved are members of different Australian states. For example: one party is from New South Wales and the other is from Victoria. Neither NCAT nor VCAT would be suitable in this scenario.

Additionally, if the case involves the interpretation of constitutional law, or commonwealth and federal laws, rather than state-based laws, the CAT is not an appropriate jurisdiction for the dispute.

Estimating Services in Australia

At Accent Estimating we provide detailed and reliable budget estimating services for construction projects. Our team of quantity surveyors will speed up your development process and ensure a fair deal for all parties.

If you would like to find out more about our estimating services available in Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and Brisbane, call us on 0413 953 869 or fill out the contact form on our website.